#Worst actio. movies ever movie

Reeves wisely declined to return for Speed 2: Cruise Control. Not many people were calling for a sequel at the end of Speed, though, because the self-contained story hardly begged for one. It even featured a surprisingly well-written, pseudo-romantic subplot between Reeves and relative newcomer Sandra Bullock. And yes, director Jan de Bont and everyone involved turned what might've been a laughably dumb B-movie premise into a top-notch action flick with charm, wit, and spectacle to burn.

Yes, that setup is every bit as silly as it sounds.

#Worst actio. movies ever movie

Bigger and bolder than its predecessor in literally every way and full of action scenes that continue to marvel decades later, Terminator 2: Judgement Day may be the greatest action movie of the decade, if not the all-time champ. It also finds Schwarzenegger's Terminator tasked with protecting both from dire fates. It finds Sarah transformed into a gun-loving survivalist and her teenage son and future resistance leader, John (Edward Furlong), the target of a perilous new threat in the form of a shape-shifting enemy. That movie found Sarah Connor (Linda Hamilton) unexpectedly at the center of a future war between man and machine, one that saw both factions sending soldiers back in time, hoping to change their fates.īut in spite of best efforts from Arnold Schwarzenegger's murderous cyborg, she lived.

That's saying a lot because the film that preceded T2 (1984's The Terminator) is itself an unquestioned action masterpiece. And as far as sequels go, it's one of the few that's arguably better than the original. The film in question is James Cameron's 1991 stunner, Terminator 2: Judgement Day. And if you've seen even five minutes of Jurassic Park (about a theme park full of resurrected dinosaurs laying waste to anyone and anything in their path), you know it to be a full-blooded action spectacular of the first order, one propelled by eye-popping visuals, jaw-dropping set pieces, and bold mix of practical and digital effects that make its CGI-loving franchise brethren look comically cheap by comparison. Titled Jurassic Par k, that novel became the basis for Spielberg's awe-inspiring, franchise-launching, dino-centric adventure flick of the same name.Ī genuine cinematic marvel from opening frame to last, Jurassic Park hit theaters at the height of the summer 1993 summer movie season, and it went on to become one of the most critically adored films of the year, as well as the year's biggest money-maker. Meanwhile, I'm open to watching a good action film, but it feels like I have watched too many.ĭespite this, which action films do you think really scrape the bottom of the barrel? Could it be that it ripped off a superior work? Could it be that the acting and the stuntwork are bad? Could it be that the budget is too small to realize the full vision of the film? Has it been relegated to the direct-to-video market due to its shoddy quality? Did an action star you once love become so washed up, dishing phoned-in performances? Any other reasons?įor example, I would choose ' Survive the Night' (2020), ' Kill Mode' (2019), ' Green Lantern' (2011), ' The Mummy' (2017), ' Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen' (2009), ' Transformers: Dark of the Moon' (2011), ' Transformers: Age of Extinction' (2014), ' Transformers: The Last Knight' (2017), ' X-Men Origins: Wolverine' (2009), ' Grand Isle' (2019), ' Tekken' (2010), ' Disturbing the Peace' (2020), ' Escape Plan 2: Hades' (2018), ' Escape Plan: The Extractors' (2019), ' Cowboys & Aliens' (2011), ' Warcraft' (2016), ' Man of Steel' (2013), ' Terminator: Genisys' (2015), ' Bloodshot' (2020), and ' The Great Wall' (2016).Impressive as that list is, Spielberg delivered arguably his greatest action film to date in 1993 when he brought to vivid life a sci-fi stunner of a novel from famed genre scribe Michael Crichton. I'm asking this because I have started thinking about it since last night and I feel like that the action film genre has become oversaturated.